Action Against Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav for Using the Term “Kat Mulla”: Removed from Key Cases
New Delhi, December 13
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of Allahabad High Court is facing criticism for his controversial statements, including the use of the term “Kat Mulla” for Muslims and saying, “The country’s law will run according to the majority.” Opposition parties and senior figures like lawyer and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal are demanding action against him, including initiating impeachment proceedings.
Change in Work Assignments
In response to the controversy, Allahabad High Court has issued a new roster, effective from December 16, significantly altering Justice Yadav’s responsibilities. Under the new arrangement, he will only hear appeals against decisions from lower courts and only cases filed before 2010. Previously, Justice Yadav handled sensitive cases such as bail matters in rape cases.
Supreme Court’s Intervention
The Supreme Court has sought a detailed report from the Allahabad High Court regarding Justice Yadav’s actions and remarks. This development is seen as a crucial step towards accountability.
Key Questions Raised
The decision to remove Justice Yadav from hearing sensitive matters has sparked debate. Although the High Court has not officially commented on the reasons for the roster change, the timing coinciding with the Supreme Court’s inquiry has raised concerns about judicial conduct and impartiality.
This action reflects the judiciary’s attempt to address public and legal concerns while maintaining the integrity of the system.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav Faces Scrutiny Over Controversial Statements
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of Allahabad High Court is under scrutiny after his controversial remarks during a program organized by the legal cell of the Vishva Hindu Parishad on December 8. His statements, which included saying that “the country’s laws should follow the majority” and using terms like “Kat Mulla,” have sparked widespread criticism. He also expressed support for the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), stating that it is necessary for the country and might be introduced soon.
Court and Public Reaction
The Supreme Court has taken note of Justice Yadav’s public statements and has sought information from the Allahabad High Court regarding the matter. Additionally, a petition was filed against him on December 10 by the “Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms” in the Supreme Court, calling for accountability.
Political and Legal Demands
Ruhullah Mehdi, a Member of Parliament from Srinagar, has proposed initiating impeachment proceedings against Justice Yadav. He announced this move via a tweet, adding momentum to the growing demand for action.
Justice Yadav’s remarks have raised concerns about judicial impartiality and accountability, prompting significant backlash from legal and political circles. This case highlights the need for maintaining decorum and neutrality in judicial conduct.
